It's GPT, not GBT, but regardless - as a new Descript paid user this is highly concerning. I understand the need for more training data, but there has to be a better model for obtaining it moving forward. People don't want their work to be stolen, and with good reason, and none of this constitutes fair use under any definition of the term. Thanks for reporting on this!
It's GPT, not GBT, but regardless - as a new Descript paid user this is highly concerning. I understand the need for more training data, but there has to be a better model for obtaining it moving forward. People don't want their work to be stolen, and with good reason, and none of this constitutes fair use under any definition of the term. Thanks for reporting on this!
It's GPT, not GBT, but regardless - as a new Descript paid user this is highly concerning. I understand the need for more training data, but there has to be a better model for obtaining it moving forward. People don't want their work to be stolen, and with good reason, and none of this constitutes fair use under any definition of the term. Thanks for reporting on this!
Your welcome — and thank you for flagging my typo; it's been updated!
At least with this typo, it's clear that I'm not a writer who ever uses ChatGPT to do my work for me LOL